Re: Mutes without Warnings?
You do realise the scope of that don't you?
Effectively no rules exist in that sense.
That MUST be changed.
Sameh wrote:They don't agree to them upon sign up?
You do realise the scope of that don't you?
Effectively no rules exist in that sense.
That MUST be changed.
Darkon wrote:Sameh wrote:They don't agree to them upon sign up?
You do realise the scope of that don't you?
Effectively no rules exist in that sense.
That MUST be changed.
You don't need players to agree with your rules, try are still there
Colours wrote:When I signed up for haypi there weren't any rules besides the basics. The common sense rules. Some of the reasons for being muted ( I.e. Impersonating an expert) aren't really specified. People might do something wrong by accident and get muted without a warning. That's not fair to the muted person. If there's a guy knowingly breaking the rules they're should still be a warning, and then a mute if they don't stop. Most experts are good at warning people but some aren't. I like almost all the experts they've really earned their positions. But I just want to clear this issue up a bit. Thanks for all your posts
SpearsInk wrote:"generally" darkon, not every senario calls for 3 warnings
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests