Trade within alliance or trade person to person

The market is already a wreck. This would not make it much worse.

This is a pointless argument...

This is a great idea and definetley should be enforced. I alone have suggested this before to.

definitely interesting..
i think it's not impossible rather to say it's not the proper time,
maybe Haypi is considering the way it operates.

I can't imagine the markets much worse than they are, so this probably wouldn't have much effect on the market prices, however I'm sure the market would come to a standstill. While a bit off topic, I would prefer to see alliance troop reinforce.

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=501
number 6

srry but its not happening guys

Haha...wow. Thank for providing that link K2700, I never saw that post. I never considered a temporary reinforcement of allied cities "slavery."

The trading issue could be negative for the game as the marketplace would be essentially useless, but it is a big stretch to equate protecting allies to slavery...but I digress.

um no there was a suggestion for trading workers, and that is considerd slavery.....

Ah...I was thinking troops instead of peasant workers...I suppose that would equate to slavery then. Either way I still like alliance reinforcements.

I don't agree with p2p trading. It could influence real world trading