Oasis refresh lunacy

First off thanks to support for listening to your players regarding attack stacking. It means alot that you do listen to us.

However IMO and many others you've made another error. Random level dropping of oasis's, I love this game I spend money on this game. In order to spend money on this game I need to work. This means I need to sleep, do my job etc. I can't be beholden to an iPhone app 24/7 and im pretty sure I'm your stereotypical haypi player, I maintain my army in short farming periods spread over several hourse (while I sleep & work etc) and set aside several hours of free time for a bit of scouting & hitting.

What I can't do is check my device every 5 mins to see if my oasis have suddenly decided to drop and put me at large drain that won't last until I make it to my breaks or I wake up. It's just unworkable so I've reduced my army size, I'm running a smaller army now and have abandoned oasis's also i will only look for smaller hits, I'm not going to enhance crop output anymore as I believe this was your true intent in doing this as I can thing of no logical explanation as to why you think this was a good idea. I don't like that tactic of forcing our hands to spend cash so I will refrain, from now on.

What I will say though is you are obviously disconnected from your customer base if you believe after 12 months without any significant content updates this copy of kingdoms of camelots daily gift system and a re hash of equipment system (pointless really) and a slight adjustment to turrets will make people play again. But what will hurt you is this silly rule on oasis's and that annoying horn.


Read the suggestions, we needed new levels & goals to achieve a mine update and that will make people play.


All you've done with the oasis is made it harder for hitters (s117 slang for large army keeping pp chasers) to play and hitters are your main source of income

[GoldenRico]

Learn to maintain smaller armies?

I believe it may be own error on their part, hopefully it is fixed. And Rico there is no need to be so sarcastic and rude, he was voicing a concern as well as his opinion. A moderator is supposed to be helpful, you however have demonstrated just the opposite in your post.

[GoldenRico]

I believe it may be own error on their part, hopefully it is fixed. And Rico there is no need to be so sarcastic and rude, he was voicing a concern as well as his opinion. A moderator is supposed to be helpful, you however have demonstrated just the opposite in your post.

Which was rude the "Learn" or "small armies" ?

What was rude was the sarcasm that was laden in your comment. You read his whole post and made the most obvious comment possible. Haypi has dropped the ball here and you act like nothing is wrong.

But then again you have to get your troll on, so ultimately your comment doesn't surprise me, just merely disappoints. I for one do hope that this oasis issue is just an error and not intentional, if it was intentional you will sees many more players leave, because it isn't worth the amount of time they will have to spend anymore.

[GoldenRico]

Or you can adapt and not hold any oasis like the veterans

I know plenty of "vets" who hold oases Rico. And I don't not ever will consider you a vet, from what I've heard, you were at best a 3rd rate player

No need to put on airs.

Rico speaks true. If ever you rely on oases you set yourself up for failure. It's another oppurtunity for troops to die outside your control at the very least.

Yet I sympathize with villan. And I must wonder....what kind of army must one have to rely on oases for sleep? Is it overkill? Could you adapt tO achieve the same ends with a different army?

Furthermore, I've noticed the same thing. Was this new decay rate intentional? I don't know. Is it troublesome? If you're looking to be a top player, yes. Perhaps someone can clear this up in the near future. But I am disappointed by it.