What the hell? Cavs vs Cats
This should definitely be fixed

Nathan05 wrote:actually cav are slighhlty better than cav as they are 1, quicker amd 2, it takes 2 cats to kill 1 cav roughly. this evens the fight if the cats are clever and can get in a preferable position to allow them to move backwards when the cavs hit
but let me explain it in basics in battle 6 things happen in an order
1.fastest side moves
2.slowest side moves
3. fastest side attacks
4.slowest side retaliates
5.slowest side attacks#
6. fastest side retaliates
noww look at this in a round where cavs should hit cats
1. cav move forward to right in front of cats
2. cats move away
3-6. if cats have moveed more than 48 hexes of the battlefield (aka the ashooting range of cavs then thhe cats are safe as they cant reach them
Yodac wrote:People would be more interested in life, if life gave more interest in them
Vayneglory wrote: Post count doesn't matter, quit bragging about it
Yodac wrote:cavs are slightly better.... unless the cats are defenders. thats because the defending troops always attack first. after the defenders, the troops with the most speed attack first. so, with high speed, cavs are better
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests