There's still a lot of balancing to do.
33 posts
• Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Before you get confused images a battle Draconios vs Mythik. None have Op abilities just a pyroblast vs spirit channel. Draconios would win because it has better stats. What more do you guys want?! To be able to one hit kill them. Where's the skill and fun in that?! What I'm saying is keep Legendaries statistically better to lower rarities but scrap the scrap ability books.
Re: There's still a lot of balancing to do.
jimboslice69 wrote:I meant a level 3 player, not monster, which is when they'll have the common monsters that you want to be able to compete with epics and legendaries.
cant be level 3. you need to be at least lvl 15 to breed. a little bit more to be able to level the monster to have fairly decent skills.
even if you are a new player you still need a little bit of work to get a legendary to a decent grade and level and make it learn decent skills.
newer players have it so much easier. talk about unbalance...this game seems to favor newer players so much more. you can get an epic/legendary just by cracking an egg. On your first day of playing you can already have an epic - not necessarily an S but it's an epic. I dont see why people have to complain about using commons. you are given coins when you join - use that to buy a blue egg. when you pass volcano you get another 10 gold - use that to buy another egg. Chances are you would get a rare or an epic, most likely an epic. (Vet players would usually just get joey or leetle from cracking a blue egg.)
Before all the patches and updates came out players were stuck with C grade draco, crusty, branchy and blocky. It took so many days even weeks of playing for us to even get a lupa XD.
Laurelix wrote: I feel outragged when I go up against a guy who goes first and one hit kill be before I can even make a turn.
We all went through this phase. And even if you get to level 28-30 there will still be a guy who can OHKO your whole line before you even make a move. That's just how it is.
if you hate having someone wipeout your whole line, do the work and level your monsters to make your monsters stronger, play team mode more than 10x a day, buy gold if you need to, farm maps to get books, play to get more coins and seal monsters for breeding, disenchant books you dont need to get the skills you want. cos that guy who beat the cr@p out of your monsters probably did all that and more.
Re: There's still a lot of balancing to do.
jimboslice69 wrote:For example, I was just playing on my cousins level 29 account. Before he quit he was top 10 in the ladder so he has great monsters. I just lost to a level 20 because he had Cerberus and fenrir and I have no shot. His cerb had heat wave and one hit my flight rhor and meniss before I got a turn and switched to his fenrir for my brawny. I didn't get an attack.
Thats exactly like me!
And i hope people still have their free speech and can write what they wish even if its sth about pokemon features which should be implemented in HM.
As i know after reading this forums couple months HM Admins or Mods always ignores when people raging or fighting each other and things get solved after time without any mod or admin ever said sth. They just ignore us and pick up the best lil things we discuss in hundreds of threads and they take this to their advantage to gain more possibilities for gaining money.
There will be new features but mostly for paying slaves (like i was)

Re: There's still a lot of balancing to do.
Lord.Rex wrote:junicobakura wrote:Wow,
So much for reading he dictionary,
As if, the Common, uncommon and rare is rarity and therefore not the way to define how "STRONG" a monster is.
It's how haypi defines it though! That's the point! Common is weak legendary is strong, period. Legendaries have higher stats=stronger. My god how are you not dead? No one that dumb should be able to function.
But not the Dictionary you are talking about.
Re: There's still a lot of balancing to do.
Legendaries should DEFENATLY have better stats because they're meant to be better, however uncommons should also have acess to the current Epic-Legendary abilities. But yeah defenatly make Legendary statistically better. There will probably be noone who'd put Power of Darkness on Mythil but at least it be more balanced and the Legendaries still will be better than uncommons statistically. And guys don't even call me dumb. I'm 16 and don't my GCSE's and got 8 A to C's. I'm expected to go university. I know what balanced is.
Re: There's still a lot of balancing to do.
Laurelix wrote:Legendaries should DEFENATLY have better stats because they're meant to be better, however uncommons should also have acess to the current Epic-Legendary abilities. But yeah defenatly make Legendary statistically better. There will probably be noone who'd put Power of Darkness on Mythil but at least it be more balanced and the Legendaries still will be better than uncommons statistically. And guys don't even call me dumb. I'm 16 and don't my GCSE's and got 8 A to C's. I'm expected to go university. I know what balanced is.
I don't know what any of that mumbo jumbo in that last two lines means but allowing lower rarity monster to learn advanced skills wouldn't balance the game. As you just said no one would put power of darkness on a mythik. So why would it even matter? It would just make maps impossibly hard like they were after one update (I forget which) where the npc monsters all had advanced skills no matter what rarity they were. It's a bad idea. Doesn't mean you're dumb, just a bad idea.
Re: There's still a lot of balancing to do.
What about 3 different types of arenas?
Common-uncommon only
Rates only
Epic-legendary only
Common-uncommon only
Rates only
Epic-legendary only
Re: There's still a lot of balancing to do.
Laurelix wrote:And guys don't even call me dumb. I'm 16 and don't my GCSE's and got 8 A to C's. I'm expected to go university. I know what balanced is.
I'm sorry but this just pointed exactly where your level of intelligence lies. Your second sentence makes no grammatical sense. Your third sentence implies that normally, people are expected NOT to go to university? Wow....
As for your last... what does level of education have to do with knowing what balanced is? Unless you are talking about balancing a weighted scale, then education does not equate to knowing what balance is.
Allowing commons, uncommons, and rares to learn advanced skills is ridiculous. Epics and legendaries are what they are due to their rarity of appearance and capture as well as their ability to learn advanced skills.

PAL code: 11vr1 (one-one-vee-are-one)
Re: There's still a lot of balancing to do.
I'd like to see your grammar for your 5th language. If you didn't know English is my 5th language. I'm not ashamed for it. Btw that's not what I wrote on 2nd last sentence. You want to know my languages?
Slovak
Polish
Czech
French
English
I hate the spell check on my phone too. In a fast Tyler and when I misspell a wire it completely changed the word into a different word or even I to two words!
Slovak
Polish
Czech
French
English
I hate the spell check on my phone too. In a fast Tyler and when I misspell a wire it completely changed the word into a different word or even I to two words!
Re: There's still a lot of balancing to do.
Anyways what about a
Common-uncommon only arena
Rare only arena
epic-legendary arena
And all rarity arena
Common-uncommon only arena
Rare only arena
epic-legendary arena
And all rarity arena
33 posts
• Page 3 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests