FAQ  •  Register  •  Login

Wall of shame HM edition

<<

caocao1

Newbie

Posts: 1

Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 6:56 pm

Post Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:02 pm

Re: Wall of shame HM edition

kleingoku wrote:amen: all above 2900 integral --> ban for a week


That's not valid proof of breaking the rules.

You can get to 2k fairly easy playing bots and than getting another 2100-2200 from playing other people. And then you are allowed to by Haypi's rule play the same account 15 times a day. That's 105 times over the course of a week.

So someone could get to 3300 fairly easy without breaking the rules.
Now 3900 yeah that's very suspect of cheating.

Is the above example unethical? Yes totally.
Is the above example breaking the rules dictated by Haypi? absolutely not.
<<

Lord.Rex

Lord

Posts: 1733

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:03 am

Post Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:05 pm

Re: Wall of shame HM edition

caocao1 wrote:
kleingoku wrote:amen: all above 2900 integral --> ban for a week


That's not valid proof of breaking the rules.

You can get to 2k fairly easy playing bots and than getting another 2100-2200 from playing other people. And then you are allowed to by Haypi's rule play the same account 15 times a day. That's 105 times over the course of a week.

So someone could get to 3300 fairly easy without breaking the rules.
Now 3900 yeah that's very suspect of cheating.

Is the above example unethical? Yes totally.
Is the above example breaking the rules dictated by Haypi? absolutely not.


If they played more than 15 times (they did in this case) then it absolutely is
Image
<<

Ryeballs

Veteran

Posts: 723

Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:42 pm

Post Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:43 pm

Re: Wall of shame HM edition

caocao1 wrote:Is the above example unethical? Yes totally.
Is the above example breaking the rules dictated by Haypi? absolutely not.


Keep in mind the rules are in place to prevent abuse without being too restrictive to normal play. But just because something isn't breaking the in game rules doesnt make it not automatically not 'abuse'. And 'abuse' as a concept is against the rules, its just loosely defined because it cant always be predicted.

All that said though, actually using the anti-'abuse' rules to penalize players probably wont happen unless it becomes too rampant and widespread across several servers :(
<<

Krister_o

User avatar

Conqueror

Posts: 996

Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 9:09 pm

Location: London Ontario, Canada

Post Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:44 pm

Re: Wall of shame HM edition

Can't fight them? Join them !
Image
<<

Ryeballs

Veteran

Posts: 723

Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:42 pm

Post Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:48 pm

Re: Wall of shame HM edition

Krister_o wrote:Can't fight them? Join them !


Ahhhh but that is the fun killer :(

Video games are designed to be played a certain way, when everyone deviates from that it generally leads to a poorer gaming experience. Competitive games are particularly vulnerable because sometimes 'winning' becomes the experience as opposed to developer designed 'playing'.
<<

CrimsonHarv

Baron

Posts: 201

Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:30 am

Post Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:33 pm

Re: Wall of shame HM edition

Seems to me that buying another ipad would be a better investment than buying coins. Using two devices will help you win faster than buying monsters or using respins.
CrimsonHarv - Server 23
Rank S - Smiter, Pewgway, Cygness, Flight, Scythe, Brawny, Meniss, Rhor, Vertedeath, Fenrir, Cerberus, Leviathan, Chimera.
<<

SnackCity

Marquis

Posts: 330

Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 4:54 pm

Post Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:34 pm

Re: Wall of shame HM edition

Wall of shame.

apple91

Vs

apple00

Main vs alt
<<

Lord.Rex

Lord

Posts: 1733

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:03 am

Post Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:42 pm

Re: Wall of shame HM edition

SnackCity wrote:Wall of shame.

apple91

Vs

apple00

Main vs alt


Pics or it didnt happen. That's the rule of the Wall
Image
<<

TarTar

Marquis

Posts: 407

Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:00 pm

Location: The Frozen North known as Canada

Post Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:08 am

Re: Wall of shame HM edition

caocao1 wrote:
kleingoku wrote:amen: all above 2900 integral --> ban for a week


That's not valid proof of breaking the rules.

You can get to 2k fairly easy playing bots and than getting another 2100-2200 from playing other people. And then you are allowed to by Haypi's rule play the same account 15 times a day. That's 105 times over the course of a week.

So someone could get to 3300 fairly easy without breaking the rules.
Now 3900 yeah that's very suspect of cheating.

Is the above example unethical? Yes totally.
Is the above example breaking the rules dictated by Haypi? absolutely not.

They should still be banned for getting over 2700. IMO, it is impossible to get over 2700 playing fairly.
Over
<<

Lord.Rex

Lord

Posts: 1733

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:03 am

Post Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:14 am

Re: Wall of shame HM edition

TarTar wrote:
caocao1 wrote:
kleingoku wrote:amen: all above 2900 integral --> ban for a week


That's not valid proof of breaking the rules.

You can get to 2k fairly easy playing bots and than getting another 2100-2200 from playing other people. And then you are allowed to by Haypi's rule play the same account 15 times a day. That's 105 times over the course of a week.

So someone could get to 3300 fairly easy without breaking the rules.
Now 3900 yeah that's very suspect of cheating.

Is the above example unethical? Yes totally.
Is the above example breaking the rules dictated by Haypi? absolutely not.

They should still be banned for getting over 2700. IMO, it is impossible to get over 2700 playing fairly.


I've gotten to 3400 without using alts and exploits. Course this was back on s2 like 2 weeks after I started. Same thing happened on s22, I was number 1 in pvp in about a week with like 3000. It's possible just not in 2 days like these people get
Image
PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software for PTF.