FAQ  •  Register  •  Login

1.2 preview (ice monsters)

<<

DeNira

User avatar

Marquis

Posts: 507

Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 6:51 am

Location: Classified Information.

Post Wed Mar 06, 2013 12:56 am

Re: 1.2 preview (ice monsters)

Ohmygosh that Snoe is kinda ugly... But look at that MA! Absolutely gorgeous c: perhaps it even rivals psychics like purrfection? (I don't recall purrfections ma at the moment but really, 166 is quite high.)
Image
Respect yourself enough to walk away from anyone or anything that no longer serves you, grows you or makes you happy.

<<

SwiftDeath_599

Baron

Posts: 218

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:04 pm

Post Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:40 am

Re: 1.2 preview (ice monsters)

DeNira wrote:Ohmygosh that Snoe is kinda ugly... But look at that MA! Absolutely gorgeous c: perhaps it even rivals psychics like purrfection? (I don't recall purrfections ma at the moment but really, 166 is quite high.)


Well.. S Purrfection @ 40 has 133 MATK right? Assuming you always get +3 on each level.. Then you'd have 163 MATK @ 50.. Isn't Snoe's a bit higher even if its S given that he is only rare? Well, this is still in testing phases i guess.. Just wanna put it out there
<<

DeNira

User avatar

Marquis

Posts: 507

Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 6:51 am

Location: Classified Information.

Post Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:54 am

Re: 1.2 preview (ice monsters)

SwiftDeath_599 wrote:
DeNira wrote:Ohmygosh that Snoe is kinda ugly... But look at that MA! Absolutely gorgeous c: perhaps it even rivals psychics like purrfection? (I don't recall purrfections ma at the moment but really, 166 is quite high.)


Well.. S Purrfection @ 40 has 133 MATK right? Assuming you always get +3 on each level.. Then you'd have 163 MATK @ 50.. Isn't Snoe's a bit higher even if its S given that he is only rare? Well, this is still in testing phases i guess.. Just wanna put it out there


Well, I wanna test out this MA and see the jumps! Then, we can probably estimate it. I should've kept my old attribute sheet... </3 Lol. Most jumps, from what I've seen, were 1/2 difference per grade. Like, B class would be 86/87 points, and B+ would be 88/89.

Most rares though tend to have defense with low attack while epics tend to throw out defense in favor of attack. Ex. Champ and Flight, Shriek and Meniss.
Image
Respect yourself enough to walk away from anyone or anything that no longer serves you, grows you or makes you happy.

<<

junicobakura

Marquis

Posts: 399

Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:35 am

Post Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:55 am

Re: 1.2 preview (ice monsters)

SwiftDeath_599 wrote:
DeNira wrote:Ohmygosh that Snoe is kinda ugly... But look at that MA! Absolutely gorgeous c: perhaps it even rivals psychics like purrfection? (I don't recall purrfections ma at the moment but really, 166 is quite high.)


Well.. S Purrfection @ 40 has 133 MATK right? Assuming you always get +3 on each level.. Then you'd have 163 MATK @ 50.. Isn't Snoe's a bit higher even if its S given that he is only rare? Well, this is still in testing phases i guess.. Just wanna put it out there


Well , Being Epic doesn't Always mean it is Stronger than Rare , Uncommon and Common.

Seriously , people should stop thinking that a monster's quality depends on it's rarity.

If you know Pokemon , Feebas is one of the Rarest Pokemon of all Time , but is it Strong?
<<

rathalos

Citizen

Posts: 140

Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 1:57 pm

Post Wed Mar 06, 2013 12:24 pm

Re: 1.2 preview (ice monsters)

junicobakura wrote:
SwiftDeath_599 wrote:
DeNira wrote:Ohmygosh that Snoe is kinda ugly... But look at that MA! Absolutely gorgeous c: perhaps it even rivals psychics like purrfection? (I don't recall purrfections ma at the moment but really, 166 is quite high.)


Well.. S Purrfection @ 40 has 133 MATK right? Assuming you always get +3 on each level.. Then you'd have 163 MATK @ 50.. Isn't Snoe's a bit higher even if its S given that he is only rare? Well, this is still in testing phases i guess.. Just wanna put it out there


Well , Being Epic doesn't Always mean it is Stronger than Rare , Uncommon and Common.

Seriously , people should stop thinking that a monster's quality depends on it's rarity.

If you know Pokemon , Feebas is one of the Rarest Pokemon of all Time , but is it Strong?


Feebas --> milotic
Milotic is pretty ok in 3rd gen, it has very high mdef.

So, not a very good example to make your point.

I think ninjask is a better example, pretty common, usable in pvp.
Or wobbuffet, not hard to get, overpowered in pvp
2AKH
Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software for PTF.