Archers

[Sylarius]

Okay just a random thought but, we all know Archers are pretty much the only troop class that have no stable role on the battlefield. They're always the outcast and also the class that nobody fears. So I've been thinking, why not just up the range on them to being slightly more that catapults? Maybe even have the same range as lvl 10 turrets?

Post your thoughts and vote.

[Sameh]

In reality, archers can't shoot as far as catapults.

However I think that archers should be able to kill one inf per archer.

Then they'd be useful.

[Sylarius]

I try to compare the troops to reality, but then I look at it and say that catapults eating more than double the crops than all of the other living troops isn't very realistic. Lol

I like this or something similar.

And realistically, catapults wouldn't be nearly as accurate and wouldn't be so powerful

[Sylarius]

Yup, Archers are suppose to be sharpshooters. In a sense they are like a sniper in the old days. The way catapults are in this game, they are like a shotgun with extended range.

Yep.
Archers need an improvent of some kind that's for sure

[Noobwars]

Catapults don't eat food, the crew required to man them does. It would easily take 10 men a catapult to operate effectively. Longbows would have had a longer range then cats, but wouldn't be too accurate at that distance

[Jamking20]

my s5 acct I used to go big on archers bc u can make around half as many archers as you can infantry but u almost get 3 prestige per archer so unget the best prestige for your resource!! It would b nice if I could actually do anything with them

How do cats eat crop anyway? They're made out of wood

People have to operate them.