Reimplement Old Alliance Rankings Also!!!

I think the old alliance ranking system (based on the member's prestige total) should be reimplemented in addition to the new ranking system. Anyone agree?

I also agree! So perhaps when you go to rankings and you select alliances, you can have two tabs. One for alliance prestige and one for the total prestige of all the members. This could introduce a bit too many ranking systems though...

Great idea Linux. I am killing off some of my army as we speak due to the fact that I see no point in individual players armies besides farming to donate resources. Why would I attack for prestige when rank means nothing? If individual prestige was brought back along with alliance prestige I would have a reason to keep an army.

Great idea! The new system does not necessarily determine the true power or skill of an alliance, and it would be nice to have both rankings available.

I agree with you Linux. All that hard work means nothing now, I do like the idea of the alliance wars but I also think that two ranking systems would be better that way it's it's not like were all just farming to feed the "super army" and that's it. Haypi really didn't think this out very well. Given the new graphics are nice but.. The game just isn't the same and I don't really know how long I can play now that the real fun is gone. I miss my old haypi

Agreed. I support this idea...

The game just isn't the same now that the real fun is gone. I miss my old haypi

Slight edit but otherwise agreed

Please bring back old alliance ranking as the current "Alliance Wars" has nothing to do with alliance strength at all. Instead, it's causing people to quit and be disheartened, cus now members are just feeders and mines are occupied based on how much coin is spent. At least with the old system, there was some way to play the game and be a decent rank without spending cash.

Since this game allows for true interaction between everyone involved, why couldn't such a boneheaded idea as AW be put on a vote or such system so loyal, dedicated players can give input? At least then we'll feel involved instead of blindsighted.

Agreed.

I'm a fan of this idea, and it's been posted a lot, just never officially "suggested" until now.

One problem though, people will get confused with alliance prestige and total prestige. So change alliance prestige to experience and keep total prestige as prestige

Since this new alliance "prestige" is gained differently than old regular prestige (even the battle system is different for amounts gained) it would fit to make this new type of prestige called experience

Alliance_A gained experience 503

I think it would fit nicely, and make it easy for newer players to tell the difference in what each one is

I'm a fan of this idea, and it's been posted a lot, just never officially "suggested" until now.

One problem though, people will get confused with alliance prestige and total prestige. So change alliance prestige to experience and keep total prestige as prestige

Since this new alliance "prestige" is gained differently than old regular prestige (even the battle system is different for amounts gained) it would fit to make this new type of prestige called experience

Alliance_A gained experience 503

I think it would fit nicely, and make it easy for newer players to tell the difference in what each one is

Yeah!