Page 3 of 4

Re: Alliance "Bank"

PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 4:56 am
by Darkon
Well I didn't actually think that what Thomas was saying was true but was wondering if you would say it was wrong.

Anyways:

cons:
Makes a current problem easier to abuse

pros:
adds a new feature to the game
adds a good way for alliances to work together(something that the game really lacks ATM)
let's people help each other when needed
Could drive market prices up

I think pros outweight cons, but that's just me.

Re: Alliance "Bank"

PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 5:02 am
by Vayneglory
You forgot:

Gives higher players a bigger advantage
Could crash the market more
People quitting do to being tired of abuse
More inactive, worthless accounts
More complaining
More work that could be better used elsewhere

You also have to consider just how bad each thing is. One problem can outweigh 50 good things. If you're going to compare things, don't purposely make them appear in your favor.

Re: Alliance "Bank"

PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 6:04 am
by Darkon
It doesn't give higher players a bigger advantage. It gives the following players advantages:
-Cheaters(bad, but as already said, it's just adding to another problem, that could be dealth with in other ways instead of using it as excuse not to put trade or aliance bank in)
-Good alliances that work together(Good thing, imo, others may think diferently)

Now that I think about it the alliance bank itself I don't think could affect the market. I'm mixing it up with player to player trading, which I believe would have a positive affect on the market.

The cheating(more useless accounts) needs to be dealt with, instead of being used as an excuse to not put in good features

Re: Alliance "Bank"

PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 6:09 am
by Vayneglory
And how do you propose Haypi stops people from using ways I won't talk about in a public forum from doing so? There's ways around everything.

And, top players will glady cheat to save money and protect their rank.

Re: Alliance "Bank"

PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 2:00 pm
by Darkon
But lower players can cheat just as much as top players can.

You can't stop them from making all those accounts, but you can punish them for doing so.

Re: Alliance "Bank"

PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 3:10 pm
by Vayneglory
Since you feel the need to argue about everything...

Thomas said it won't happen. End of story.

Re: Alliance "Bank"

PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 3:31 pm
by Darkon
I argue for what I believe in(even if the head moderator, or admin disagrees with me, that isn't going to change my mind)

He said it's not going to happen for a reason. If that reason can be dealt with, there is no longer a reason for it not to happen.

(btw, he also said that it's impossible to make more than one account on the same device. We can't rely on everything he says)

Re: Alliance "Bank"

PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 10:26 pm
by TheBlade
Heated debate here, anyway I believe possibilities of abuse are too high. I had to WORK to get my treasure maybe you guys should too.

Re: Alliance "Bank"

PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 10:55 pm
by Darkon
It's a matter of if you believe the game should be played individually, or in actual teams(not just "alliances" under name). I believe the second.

Re: Alliance "Bank"

PostPosted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:37 pm
by Rodic
we need to make a way for alliances to help eachother. this game is fun but its simplicity gets old. war with other alliances almost never gets visible results, you can't help anyone, and attacking is too random. this game just needs to improve on things it already has, just by going into more depth, mainly the things we set up on our own, like cheap market trades for friends and allliance wars.