Re: Max Fortune, Is It Worth It?
Gabe12 wrote:Yea, but it would be much better to just get speed up then it would be to fortune.
Again... thats a matter of opinion. It depends on what you want to do in the game.
Gabe12 wrote:Yea, but it would be much better to just get speed up then it would be to fortune.
08pearsj wrote:Gabe12 wrote:Yea, but it would be much better to just get speed up then it would be to fortune.
Again... thats a matter of opinion. It depends on what you want to do in the game.
Kevstev wrote:I have found that increasing speed helps out hunts more than fortune. I don't have any real numbers to back that up, but a few days ago I upgraded my horse from lev 1 to lev 5, and in a 16 hour hunt I recieved $14k- I think my previous high on a hunt was 4 or 5k.
The items I get on hunts tend to have a lot less worth than the equivalent $. I feel like I get level1 rings several times a day, when even a crappy hunt gives me at least $1k. I generally hunt for 12 hours.
08pearsj wrote:Kevstev wrote:I have found that increasing speed helps out hunts more than fortune. I don't have any real numbers to back that up, but a few days ago I upgraded my horse from lev 1 to lev 5, and in a 16 hour hunt I recieved $14k- I think my previous high on a hunt was 4 or 5k.
The items I get on hunts tend to have a lot less worth than the equivalent $. I feel like I get level1 rings several times a day, when even a crappy hunt gives me at least $1k. I generally hunt for 12 hours.
Based on the information you have presented here, it is impossible to deduce that logically. Since hunts are based on luck and a combination of fortune and speed, you cannot state after one hunt, that speed is better. Additionally, your increase of 4 speed would not have made a difference of that much. A combination of luck, your stats, and hunting in an area that no one had hunted in previously led to that result. Nothing more. You could have easily gotten a level 15 ring and equipped it with the same result, however, nothing could be deduced from that either. For a situation such as this, hundreds of trials would be required in order to get any factual data at all.
Therefore, I am inclined to disredit your response. Nothing here is proven, factual, or has any relevance to the topic at hand.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests